joshua at slive
Jul 27, 2008, 7:38 AM
Post #2 of 3
(284 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: <glossary> tag that links to the glossary
[In reply to]
|
|
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Nilgün Belma Bugüner
<nilgun[at]belgeler.gen.tr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to get your opinion and feedback on certain needs for
> pre-translation improvements. When I translate trunk documents and apply
> that translation to the relevant branches, I usually notice that the
> <glossary> tags that exist in other branches (2.2.x in this case)
> do not exist in the 2.0.x documents. I do not know the reason but
> I keep the <glossary> tags in this type of content in my translations
> because the resulting links to the glossary work just as well.
> The only difference is in their appearance which can easily be
> overcome with a small patch. I attach here a patch so that the links
> generated by the <glossary> tags in 2.0.x documents will have
> the same appearance in other branches (2.2.x and trunk in this case).
> Would you like to apply this patch?
>
> I cannot promise that I will find and correct all such instances in the
> currently translated 2.0.x documents, however I can make sure in future
> translations that whenever such labels exist in other branches, they
> also exist in the 2.0.x documents. Would you like me to do that?
I don't have any problem with that if it makes your life easier.
But my suggestion in general is to just forget about the 2.0 branch.
That will really make your life easier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe[at]httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help[at]httpd.apache.org
|
glossary_patch_for_2.0.x
