guenther at rudersport
Oct 16, 2008, 2:56 PM
Post #22 of 27
(418 views)
Permalink
|
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:10 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Yes, that works fine. What doesn't work is where the "score RULE (adj)"
> entry is in a channel ruleset, and the original rule is in a different
> channel or the stock ruleset.
>
> At least, as of last time I tried that was the case. And it still seems
> to be:
>
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK (-1)" is
> not valid for "score", skipping: score FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK (-1)
> channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed
Unlike regular score lines for non-existent rules (which are kind of
ignored), the relative score adjustment depends on the rule to be
defined before.
Given your demo rule above, you are distributing a custom channel. It
will work, if you rename the channel name to come after the stock
updates channel when sorting lexically.
guenther
> (Even though exactly the same line in local.cf lints just fine, and in
> fact if I copy the particular file that rule is in to SA's system config
> directory, that *also* lints fine.)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
|
1
