hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail
Sep 3, 2008, 12:45 AM
Post #1 of 1
(253 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Digest 1.405 for spf-help
|
|
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> there is a problem in that listbox software does not follow
> rfc2822
> https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=81126
Where in RFC 2822 did you find a Precedence header field, let
alone a mandatory Precedence: list header field for lists ?
This is apparently not even provisionally registered, compare
RFC 4021 and the IANA header field registries below
http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-header-index.html
If Google wants that fixed they could hire me... :-)
There are a bunch of RFCs discussing List-* header fields,
and other RFCs discussing auto-replies including "vacation"
and "out of office" spam.
For stupid mailbots users could configure "at least don't
spam my mailing lists, they will unsubscibe me" manually.
> Precedence: list
> header, most autoresponders i know of dont reply if that
> header exists
The implementors of broken "auto-responders" are a public
danger. What you see here on the list is only the tip of
the ice-berg, the rest ends up in your inbox whenever you
post here (I'll forward my share to spamcop).
Frank
--
<http://www.openspf.org/Frank_Ellermann/Auto-responders>
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1020/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1020/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
|
